{"id":10992,"date":"2025-12-10T13:54:02","date_gmt":"2025-12-10T13:54:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rutha.org\/index.php\/2025\/12\/10\/it-shouldnt-be-radical-how-one-creative-director-took-a-sabbatical\/"},"modified":"2025-12-10T13:54:02","modified_gmt":"2025-12-10T13:54:02","slug":"it-shouldnt-be-radical-how-one-creative-director-took-a-sabbatical","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rutha.org\/index.php\/2025\/12\/10\/it-shouldnt-be-radical-how-one-creative-director-took-a-sabbatical\/","title":{"rendered":"It Shouldn\u2019t Be Radical: How One Creative Director Took a Sabbatical"},"content":{"rendered":"

For creative workers, making<\/em> is the point. But how, why, and for whom is where it often gets sticky. Those were the questions that Joyce N. Ho<\/a>, an Emmy Award-winning creative director who has designed graphics for acclaimed TV series and worldwide ad campaigns, was asking herself. She has been industrious and career-focused her entire adult life, but early in 2025, she did something unexpected. She took a step back and hit pause. <\/p>\n

\u201cWhat I was feeling after working for 14 years nonstop was that I started to get more and more away from the reason I got into design in the first place,\u201d she says. Like most \u201cpeople on the box\u201d, as Ho calls them, she entered graphic design with a desire to make<\/em>. She had a spark in her eye. Since 2013, when I encountered her work for the opening title sequence for what was then called Analogue\/Digital, a design conference held in Brisbane, Australia, she has been piloting a rocketship of success. She has contributed to projects including the influential titles for True Detective<\/em> (2014), the opening to lauded sci-fi series The Expanse<\/em> (2015) with studio Breeder, and graphics for Patriot Act with Hasan Minhaj <\/em>(2019). In 2021, Ho won an Emmy for her work on The 2020 Iowa Brown & Black Presidential Forum<\/em> presented by Vice News. That same year, she joined global agency Buck as an associate creative director. Fast forward to 2025: she\u2019s now a creative director with more than a decade of full-tilt grindstone behind her. She began to feel an itch. The spark was dwindling.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

\u201cI should<\/em> be happy because this is what I wanted,\u201d Ho says. But she missed hands-on design work. She began to wonder if she had chosen the wrong path. \u201cI lost a joy,\u201d she admits. It was an alarm bell she could not ignore. \u201cI needed to hit reset on my work and have the mental space to dive into some of these feelings.\u201d That hallowed word came to her, a whisper on the wind: sabbatical<\/em>. <\/p>\n

A weekend, a week, even a fortnight did not seem adequate lengths of time to understand the roots of these feelings. Early in 2025, she took several months away from her role as creative director at Buck. During this time, she collaborated with a friend to rebrand herself, dove into generative abstract art, and created an array of objects with her own joy in mind.<\/p>\n

I reached her via Zoom to discuss her sabbatical, the personal work she made, and how she feels now, looking back at those experiences. Our chat is edited for length and clarity.<\/p>\n

First, tell me how the sabbatical worked. How did you navigate it in terms of your role at Buck?<\/strong><\/p>\n

I asked about a year in advance, and I took three months off. For Buck, a sabbatical is open to anyone. You have to give a lot of heads-up that you want to do it, so that the company can plan. And then it’s case-by-case, depending on how much time you want to take off, when it lands in the year, and so on. It was unpaid, but I was guaranteed my job when I came back.<\/p>\n

While you were on your sabbatical, you undertook a rebrand. People might assume, being a designer, you would do it yourself, but you worked with another designer. How did you decide to do this?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yeah! The idea to rebrand and refresh my website happened before my sabbatical. It was always my goal, mainly because my old site and my old body of work didn’t quite represent who I was evolving into. Plus, I was just bored with the design. I have a close friend, Emily Sims, whom I met at Buck. Her expertise is in branding and beautiful photography. I wanted to work with someone I knew because I wanted that balance between someone who knows me\u2014who I am as a person and as a creative\u2014but who can also give me an outside perspective.<\/p>\n